Michael L. and Susan Barnard - Page 14




                                       - 14 -                                         
          Commissioner, 979 F.2d 1176, 1178 (6th Cir. 1992), affg. T.C.               
          Memo. 1991-320; Traficant v. Commissioner, 884 F.2d 258, 263 (6th           
          Cir. 1989), affg. 89 T.C. 501 (1987); Calderone v. United States,           
          799 F.2d 254, 258 (6th Cir. 1986).  A taxpayer must generally               
          prove by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent’s                  
          determination is erroneous.  Helvering v. Taylor, supra at 515;             
          Traficant v. Commissioner, supra at 263; Calderone v. United                
          States, supra at 258.                                                       
               Income is computed under the net worth method by determining           
          a taxpayer's net worth at the beginning and end of a taxable                
          year.  The difference between those two amounts is the increase             
          in the taxpayer’s net worth.  This difference is increased by               
          adding nondeductible expenditures, e.g., living expenses, and by            
          subtracting gifts, inheritances, loans, and other nontaxable                
          receipts.  Holland v. United States, supra at 125; United States            
          v. Giacalone, 574 F.2d 328, 330-331 (6th Cir. 1978).  An increase           
          in a taxpayer's net worth, plus his or her nondeductible                    
          expenditures, less nontaxable receipts, may be considered taxable           
          income.  Holland v. United States, supra.                                   
               Petitioners argue primarily that respondent's use of the net           
          worth method was inappropriate because, they assert, they                   
          maintained sufficient records as to their income.  We disagree.             
          First, as a point of fact, petitioners did not maintain                     
          sufficient records from which respondent could accurately compute           






Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011