Clarke D. and Joanne S. Bittner - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
          issue, the rent charged for the apartment was $620 per month.               
          Mrs. Bittner paid the rent through biweekly payroll deductions.             
               Petitioner Clarke D. Bittner (Mr. Bittner) is an actor.  Mr.           
          Bittner contends that during the years in issue he needed to                
          maintain an apartment in New York City for use in his acting                
          career.  Mr. Bittner also contends that he sublet the New York              
          City apartment from his wife during these years.  Mr. Bittner               
          further alleges that he paid rent to his wife by giving her                 
          promissory notes and that he paid the notes by depositing his               
          revenue from his acting career into a joint checking account that           
          he and Mrs. Bittner maintained.  Mr. Bittner has not alleged that           
          his acting career required him to maintain a home in Dallas.                
               During the years in issue, petitioners generally occupied              
          the New York City apartment on those days when Mrs. Bittner                 
          worked at the hospital and when Mr. Bittner’s acting career                 
          required him to be in New York.  During the weekends, petitioners           
          normally returned to their residence in Dallas.                             
               On their 1993, 1994, and 1995 Federal income tax returns,              
          petitioners claimed deductions for rent of $5,580, $7,550, and              
          $5,580, respectively.  Petitioners contend that Mr. Bittner paid            
          rent to his wife for use of the apartment in New York while he              
          was traveling away from home in pursuit of his acting career.               
          Petitioners contend that their tax home was in Dallas during                
          these years.  Respondent argues that petitioners are not entitled           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011