J. Clark and Mary R. Bundren - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
          both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.”  Gresham v.            
          Commissioner, 79 T.C. 322, 326 (1982), affd. 752 F.2d 518 (10th             
          Cir. 1985).  The burden is on petitioners to prove that                     
          respondent’s determination of fair market value is incorrect.               
          See Rule 142(a).                                                            
               Respondent contends that the fair market value of the 84th             
          Street property at the time of the conversion (and also on the              
          date of the exchange) was $134,500.  As support for this                    
          position, respondent notes that this was the contract price for             
          the 84th Street property as specified in the September 2, 1994,             
          like-kind exchange with Youngblood only a few months after the              
          conversion.  Respondent also notes that the $134,500 figure is              
          consistent with the gradual downturn in the Tulsa real estate               
          market from the time petitioners purchased the property in 1982             
          for $183,000, until it was appraised for $150,500 in October                
          1992, until it was converted to rental property in 1994.                    
               Petitioners contend that the fair market value of the 84th             
          Street property was either $217,450–-as reflected in their 1995             
          Federal income tax return--or alternatively, $200,000.                      
          Petitioners have offered no credible, admissible evidence,                  
          however, to support either of their alternative positions.6                 


               6 At trial, petitioners’ tax return preparer, Mr. Patrick              
          Walters (Walters), testified that in preparing petitioners’ tax             
          returns, he had relied on information from an appraiser regarding           
          the value of the 84th Street property.  At trial, Walters’                  
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011