Caralan Trust, et al. - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          Trust Cases                                                                 
               As a preliminary matter, we must decide whether we should              
          dismiss the four cases in which the taxpayer is a trust.2  When             
          these consolidated cases were recalled from the calendar of the             
          trial session of this Court commencing on June 5, 2000, in                  
          San Francisco, California, the Court, on its own motion,                    
          questioned its jurisdiction to consider the petitions relating to           
          Caralan Trust and Alexion Trust because of the lack of a proper             
          party before the Court.  Respondent moved to dismiss for lack of            
          jurisdiction with respect to C E Shirley Trust and Congo Trust.             
          On June 14, 2000, following proceedings in which counsel                    
          established Ivan Oviedo, Joseph Shirley, and Curtis Shirley as              
          trustees for Caralan Trust, C E Shirley Trust, and Alexion Trust,           
          respectively, and we concluded that we did have jurisdiction in             
          those cases, we ordered that one motion for substitutions of                
          parties and changes of caption be made with respect to such                 
          trusts.  Such motion was due on July 14, 2000.  Also on June 14,            
          2000, the Court ordered that a motion for substitution of party             
          and change of caption be made with respect to Congo Trust, such             
          motion to be accompanied by a memorandum of law setting forth the           
          grounds for establishing the substituted party as a trustee.                
          Such motion and memorandum also were due on July 14, 2000.                  
          Neither motion (nor the memorandum of law) was received as                  


               2  Docket Nos. 10151-99, 10152-99, 17075-99, and 17076-99.             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011