Thomas N. Carmena - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         

          interest due on a deficiency of $10,459 under section 6653(a)(2),           
          and $2,615 under section 6661.                                              
               The issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioner is                 
          liable for the additions to tax under section 6653(a)(1) and (2)            
          for negligence, and (2) whether petitioner is liable for the                
          addition to tax under section 6661 for a substantial                        
          understatement of tax.  The issues in this case relate to the               
          participation of petitioner as a limited partner in a partnership           
          known as Utah Jojoba I Research (Utah I or the partnership).2               
               Some of the facts were stipulated, and those facts, with the           
          annexed exhibits, are so found and are incorporated herein by               
          reference.  At the time the petition was filed, petitioner's                
          legal residence was Las Vegas, Nevada.                                      
               Petitioner is a medical doctor whose particular area of                
          specialty is internal medicine.  Petitioner has practiced                   
          internal medicine in the Las Vegas, Nevada, area since 1962.                
          Petitioner became acquainted with Dr. William K. Stephan (Dr.               
          Stephan), a retired anesthesiologist who had taken steps to                 
          become a licensed investment adviser.  Dr. Stephan approached               
          petitioner about investing in Utah I, which was being promoted as           


               2    The stipulation of facts in this case reflects that the           
          actual participant in Utah I was the Neil Carmena Family Trust, a           
          grantor trust of which petitioner was the grantor and whose                 
          income and deductions were reported as petitioner's on his                  
          Federal income tax returns.  For simplicity, the Court refers to            
          petitioner as the participant in Utah I.                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011