James P. and Marilyn S. Cashman - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         

          registered individual that could be used in emergency situations.           
          Petitioner testified that he did not consider I.D. Club to be a             
          corporation because it never filed corporate returns, never had             
          minutes or meetings, and was not in good standing with the State.           
          He stated:  "this business was not turned on.  It was not in                
          operation.  It was all being set up to be turned on, to be a                
          corporation at some point.  This was not an operating system in             
          1995."                                                                      
               From the time I.D. Club and its predecessors were initially            
          incorporated throughout 1995, the corporation never had any gross           
          receipts.  However, in 1995, I.D. Club entered into various                 
          agreements with third parties.  Petitioner would sign for the               
          corporation or as its president.  No documents were signed in               
          petitioner's name personally without the corporation listed under           
          his name.  Petitioner took no steps to dissolve the corporation             
          prior to 1997 when it was automatically dissolved by the state.             
               Petitioners reported $12,988 of expenses on their 1995                 
          Schedule C for I.D. Club.  The expenses consisted of car and                
          truck expenses of $6,503, legal and professional services of                
          $1,640, office expense of $1,320, supplies of $418, meals and               
          entertainment of $532, utilities of $738, and other expenses of             
          $1,837.  Because there was no income reported on the Schedule C,            
          petitioners claimed a $12,988 loss.  Respondent disallowed the              
          deductions for all of these expenses.                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011