James K. Gaudet - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          Virginia had filed their 1996 tax return.  Virginia gave                    
          petitioner a Form 1099 that he filed away for their 1997 tax                
          return.  Petitioner claims that Virginia told him that the Form             
          1099 pertained to the 1997 taxable year.  Petitioner apparently             
          never looked at the form.  Virginia received monthly statements             
          from Legg Mason, but petitioner did not review the statements in            
          preparing their 1996 tax return.  Petitioner did not include any            
          income from Legg Mason in the 1996 tax return.                              
               On July 20, 1998, respondent sent a Notice CP-2000, Proposed           
          Changes to Income or Withholding Tax, a so-called CP-2000 letter,           
          to petitioner and Virginia notifying them that they had                     
          unreported interest and/or dividend income of $14,248.  By letter           
          dated July 21, 1998, petitioner wrote respondent to “contest any            
          and all interest charges because your office should have notified           
          me during calander [sic] year 1996 and no later than the month of           
          August of 1996.”  At least by July 1998, petitioner knew that the           
          deficiency had been proposed, but he wanted to “investigate it              
          before * * * [he replied].”  By the end of September 1998,                  
          petitioner knew that the proposed deficiency was correct.1                  
               On February 5, 1999, respondent sent a notice of deficiency            
          to petitioner’s and Virginia’s last known address determining a             


               1  Petitioner later testified that he concluded that he owed           
          the tax only after the file was sent to New Orleans, Louisiana.             
          For reasons discussed infra, we believe that his earlier                    
          testimony more accurately reflected what happened.                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011