Estate of Paul C. Gribauskas - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          tables.  Rather, it is the estate’s position that the broader               
          willing-buyer, willing-seller standard should control, with                 
          factors such as lack of marketability taken into account in                 
          discounting the prize to present value.                                     
               In the alternative, the estate contends that even if the               
          lottery award is held includible in decedent’s gross estate as an           
          annuity under section 2039, deviation from the prescribed tables            
          is warranted in this case.  The estate claims that the tables may           
          be disregarded when their use would produce an unreasonable                 
          result and that, due to restrictions on the asset in question,              
          such a situation is present here.                                           
               Conversely, respondent asserts that decedent’s right to 18             
          fixed annual payments constitutes an annuity which must be valued           
          pursuant to section 7520.  With respect to section 2039,                    
          respondent maintains that the lottery installments satisfy all              
          elements for inclusion in the gross estate under subsection (a)             
          and that no grounds are provided in subsection (b) for limiting             
          such inclusion.  However, regardless of the specific                        
          applicability of section 2039, it is respondent’s position that             
          the LOTTO prize is an interest to which section 7520 applies.               
          Respondent avers that the statute cited for inclusion in the                
          gross estate is not dispositive of whether tabular valuation is             
          mandated.  Rather, it is the nature of the payment stream at                
          issue that controls, and respondent contends that the periodic              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011