Thomas F. Hale - Page 7




                                        - 6 -                                         

          he had in the past, although he "looked after" the property for             
          Mr. Burns.                                                                  
               Section 1221 provides:                                                 

                    For purposes of this subtitle, the term "capital asset"           
               means property held by the taxpayer (whether or not                    
               connected with his trade or business), but does not                    
               include--                                                              
                    (1) stock in trade of the taxpayer * * *;                         
                    (2) property, used in his trade or business, of a                 
               character * * * subject to * * * depreciation * * *;                   
                    (3) a copyright * * *;                                            
                    (4) accounts or notes receivable acquired in the                  
               ordinary course of * * * business * * *;                               
                    (5) a publication of the United States Government                 
               * * *;                                                                 

               Section 1222(3) provides:  "The term 'long-term capital                
          gain' means gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset."             
          (Emphasis added.)                                                           
               There was no sale or exchange of any property by petitioner            
          during 1996.  The title to the property discussed above had been            
          transferred, sold, or conveyed by petitioner to Mr. Burns in                
          1993.  What occurred during 1996 between petitioner and Mr. Burns           
          was the relinquishment by petitioner of what petitioner contended           
          was an option for purchase of the property.  That option was                
          predicated on a promissory note of $21,000 that petitioner had              
          executed in favor of Mr. Burns during 1993.  There is no evidence           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011