Thaddeus D. Hollingsworth - Page 7




                                        - 6 -                                         

          1995, 1996, or 1997.  Therefore, petitioner satisfies the first             
          requirement of section 2(b).  However, petitioner fails to                  
          establish the second requirement because he did not maintain his            
          home as the principal place of abode for his children for more              
          than one-half of any of the years in issue.  Petitioner testified           
          that the children lived with him on the weekends and during the             
          summer months, which does not meet the time period requirement of           
          section 2(b).                                                               
               Therefore, petitioner is not entitled to file his 1995,                
          1996, and 1997 Federal income tax returns as head of household.             
          Respondent is sustained on this issue.                                      
          Earned Income Credit                                                        
               The relevant parts of section 32 provide that an individual            
          is eligible for the earned income credit if the individual has a            
          qualifying child.  A “qualifying child” is a son or daughter of             
          the taxpayer who has not attained the age of 19 at the end of the           
          taxable year and shares the same principal place of abode in the            
          United States with the taxpayer for more than one-half of the               
          taxable year.  Neither child was 19 years old at the end of 1995,           
          1996, or 1997.  But because petitioner’s children resided with              
          him for less than one-half of the 1995, 1996, and 1997 taxable              
          years, petitioner fails to meet the time period requirement of              
          section 32.  Respondent is sustained on this issue.                         







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011