Basavaraj A. Hooli and Vindodini B. Hooli - Page 5




                                        - 4 -                                         
               Generally, a taxpayer is permitted to deduct all ordinary              
          and necessary expenses paid or incurred in carrying on a trade or           
          business.  See sec. 162(a).  No deduction is allowed for                    
          personal, living, or family expenses.  See sec. 262.                        
          Consequently, where an expenditure is primarily associated with             
          business purposes, and where personal benefit is distinctly                 
          secondary and incidental, the expenditure may be deducted under             
          section 162.  See International Artists, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 55           
          T.C. 94, 104 (1970).  Conversely, if an expenditure is primarily            
          motivated by personal considerations, generally no deduction will           
          be allowed.  See Henry v. Commissioner, 36 T.C. 879, 884 (1961).            
               Taxpayers are required to keep sufficient records to enable            
          the Commissioner to determine their correct tax liability.  See             
          sec. 6001.  Under certain circumstances, where a taxpayer                   
          establishes entitlement to a deduction but does not establish the           
          amount of the deduction, the Court is permitted to estimate the             
          amount allowable.  See Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d 540 (2d               
          Cir. 1930).  However, there must be sufficient evidence in the              
          record to permit the Court to conclude that a deductible expense            
          was incurred in at least the amount allowed.  See Williams v.               
          United States, 245 F.2d 559, 560 (5th Cir. 1957).  In estimating            
          the amount allowable, the Court bears heavily against the                   
          taxpayer whose inexactitude is of his own making.  See Cohan v.             
          Commissioner, supra at 544.                                                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011