Donald J. Janda - Page 11



                                       - 11 -                                         
          investment (along with any dividends distributed) does not meet             
          the shareholder’s required rate of return for a specified period.           
          See id. at 212-215.  Mr. Mercer advises that the required rate of           
          return should reflect the “investor’s required rate of return, or           
          the opportunity cost of investing in the subject company versus             
          another, similar investment that has immediate market liquidity.”           
          Id. at 214.                                                                 
               In the instant cases, Mr. Wahlgren applied a 9.12-percent              
          growth rate, a zero-percent distribution yield, a holding period            
          of 10 years, and a required holding period return of 21.47                  
          percent.  Mr. Wahlgren determined that the Company’s growth rate            
          depended on the increasing value of the Bank, the Company’s                 
          primary asset.  Mr. Wahlgren, in turn, computed the growth rate             
          for the value of the Bank using the average return on equity                
          between 1988 and 1992 (13.54 percent) of the Bank.  Because the             
          average return on equity was based on the historical book values            
          of the Bank, Mr. Wahlgren reduced the average return by dividing            
          it by a factor of 1.4853 to account for the difference between              
          the estimated fair market value and historical book value of the            
          Bank as of December 31, 1992.6                                              
               With regard to the dividend yield, Mr. Wahlgren concluded              
          that the Company did not have a history of making distributions             



               6  Mr. Wahlgren rounded the 1.4853 factor to 1.49 when                 
          discussing the ratio between the fair market value of the Bank to           
          the historical book value of the stockholders’ equity in the                
          Bank.  See supra p. 9.                                                      




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011