John Ralph Johnson - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
          asserting that respondent did not mail the notices of deficiency            
          to his last known address.                                                  
                                     Background                                       
               Respondent determined deficiencies of $1,024 and $1,931 in             
          petitioner’s Federal income taxes for 1993 and 1994,                        
          respectively, and additions thereto of $188.50 and $164.50,                 
          respectively, under section 6651(a).  Respondent reflected these            
          determinations in notices of deficiency which he mailed to                  
          petitioner on October 24, 1997, at the address of “P.O. Box 565,            
          Springfield, OR 97477".  Petitioner petitioned the Court on                 
          January 3, 2001, to redetermine the determinations set forth in             
          the notices of deficiency.  At that time, he resided in the                 
          Airways Heights Correction Center in Airway Heights, Washington.            
                                     Discussion                                       
               Respondent contends that this case should be dismissed as              
          the petition was not filed within the time prescribed by statute.           
          Petitioner contends that respondent mailed the notices of                   
          deficiency to the wrong address and that he only received them on           
          October 22, 2000.  Petitioner asserts that he has been                      
          incarcerated since September 18, 1994.                                      
               Our jurisdiction to redetermine a deficiency depends upon              
          the issuance of a valid notice of deficiency and a timely filed             
          petition.  See Rule 13(a), (c); Monge v. Commissioner, 93 T.C.              
          22, 27 (1989); Abeles v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 1019, 1025 (1988);           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011