Seymour and Beatrice Leffert - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
               On June 25, 1985, Blue Gem’s Forms 1065, U.S. Partnership              
          Return of Income, for 1982 and 1983 were selected for examination           
          by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).  The examination of Blue             
          Gem’s partnership returns for 1982 and 1983 was assigned to                 
          Revenue Agent Charles Vassalo and was conducted from                        
          approximately July 1985 through February 1988.                              
               On July 22, 1985, Revenue Agent Vassalo sent an appointment            
          letter to John Herbst, the tax matters partner of Blue Gem (the             
          Blue Gem TMP).3  On July 26, 1985, the appointment letter was               
          returned to the sender as undeliverable.  On August 5, 1985,                
          Revenue Agent Vassalo attempted to contact the Blue Gem TMP by              
          telephone and left a message for him at his place of business.              
          That same day, Revenue Agent Vassalo received a telephone call              
          from Irving Kratz, a certified public accountant who had prepared           
          Blue Gem’s 1982 and 1983 partnership returns, concerning the Blue           
          Gem examination.  Revenue Agent Vassalo continued to deal                   
          primarily with Mr. Kratz during the Blue Gem examination.                   




               3Under the TEFRA unified audit and litigation provisions, a            
          properly functioning tax matters partner (TMP) is critical to an            
          efficient and fair partnership audit since the TMP bears                    
          responsibility for notifying partners of developments and                   
          ensuring that partners have a meaningful opportunity to                     
          participate in the partnership proceeding.  In keeping with a               
          TMP’s statutory and regulatory responsibilities, the TMP acts as            
          a fiduciary whose actions will affect the rights of all partners            
          in the partnership.  See Phillips v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 115,            
          120-121 (2000).                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011