U.R. Neely - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
               Petitioner described the workers to the revenue agent as               
          independent contractors.  Petitioner further informed the revenue           
          agent that the workers had provided services to other people and            
          that they reported directly to the appropriate job sites.4                  
          Petitioner cooperated with the revenue agent in every aspect                
          requested and provided her with all pertinent documents and                 
          records.                                                                    
               Petitioner and respondent settled all matters relating to              
          the examination of petitioner’s individual income tax return.  As           
          part of the settlement agreement, petitioner stipulated various             
          aspects of the relationship which the workers maintained with the           
          company,5 and respondent allowed the payments to the workers to             
          be included in the labor component of cost of goods sold.  At               
          this point, petitioner provided respondent with Forms 1099-MISC,            
          Miscellaneous Income, concerning the payments to the workers.               
          Notice of Determination                                                     
               On June 11, 1998, respondent mailed to petitioner a Notice             
          of Determination Concerning Worker Classification Under Section             
          7436 in which respondent determined that (1) the workers were               



               4  The revenue agent was equivocal in her recollection that            
          petitioner had described the workers as having submitted bids to            
          him for particular jobs.                                                    
               5  Specifically, petitioner stipulated that (a) the workers            
          were required to comply with petitioner’s instructions about                
          when, where, and how their work was to be performed; (b)                    
          petitioner had the right to discharge each of the workers; and              
          (c) the workers could have terminated their relationship with               
          petitioner at any time without incurring liability.                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011