Tiffany Paramore - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
          Fortune.  Mr. Fortune was employed during 1998, but petitioner              
          did not secure employment.  At the end of August 1998, petitioner           
          and Simeon moved in with petitioner’s mother, while the youngest            
          two children remained with Mr. Fortune.                                     
               Petitioner, Simeon, and Dequane lived with petitioner’s                
          mother through the end of the year.  Petitioner secured                     
          employment by the end of November 1998, and her mother worked               
          during the period at issue.  Simeon lived with petitioner for all           
          of 1998.                                                                    
               Petitioner earned wages of $7,186 in 1998.  Petitioner also            
          received $5,064 in housing subsidies from HUD for herself and her           
          four children.  In addition, petitioner and her four children               
          received $2,372 from AFDC and $2,998 in food stamps.  Further,              
          Simeon’s father, Simeon Gemaele Thomas, paid $396.68 of child               
          support in 1998.                                                            
               On her 1998 Federal income tax return, petitioner claimed              
          (1) a dependency exemption deduction for Simeon and (2) an earned           
          income credit with Simeon listed as a qualifying child.                     
          Petitioner also filed her return claiming head-of-household                 
          filing status.                                                              
               In the notice of deficiency to petitioner, respondent                  
          disallowed the dependency exemption deduction and earned income             
          tax credit.  Respondent alleges that petitioner failed to meet              
          the requirements for the dependency exemption deduction and did             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011