Thomas C. Sandoval, Jr. - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and                  
          Procedure.                                                                  
               After concessions the remaining issues are whether                     
          petitioner:  (1) May deduct certain expenses relating to his                
          residential real estate, (2) has net operating losses to offset a           
          portion of his 1994 taxable income, (3) is allowed a depreciation           
          deduction for property purportedly used in his trade or business,           
          and (4) is liable for a section 6662(a) penalty relating to                 
          negligence.                                                                 
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Petitioner resided in San Antonio, Texas, at the time he               
          filed his petition.                                                         
               During the year in issue, petitioner was married to Bobbie             
          J. Sandoval; was the sole proprietor of Allied Electric and Air             
          Conditioning Co. (Allied Electric), an electric and air                     
          conditioning business; and was the owner of real estate in San              
          Antonio located at 4330 Seabrook Drive (Seabrook), 320 Indiana              
          (Indiana), and a duplex at 137 and 139 El Monte Boulevard (El               
          Monte).  Seabrook, Indiana, and El Monte were purchased in 1979,            
          1987, and 1988, respectively.                                               
               On petitioner’s 1994 Federal income tax return, received by            
          respondent on October 19, 1995, he omitted his rental activities,           
          incorrectly claimed single filing status, and did not review the            








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011