Ervin Michael Sarrell - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          Office in New Orleans, Louisiana, issued to petitioner a Notice             
          Of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section              
          6320 and/or 6330 regarding petitioner’s unpaid Federal income tax           
          liability for 1995.  The notice of determination was sent to                
          petitioner by registered mail addressed to him at Hairus 7 Moshav           
          Gan Haim 44910, Israel (Israel address).  The notice of                     
          determination informed petitioner that if he wanted to dispute              
          respondent’s determination in court, then he must file a petition           
          with this Court “within 30 days from the date of this letter.”              
               On May 7, 2001, the Court received and filed a Petition for            
          Lien or Levy Action Under Code Section 6320(c) or 6330(d).  The             
          petition, which is dated April 29, 2001, arrived at the Court in            
          a properly addressed envelope that petitioner mailed to the Court           
          from the Israel address.  The envelope bears a sticker from the             
          Israel Postal Authority indicating that it was sent by registered           
          mail; the envelope also bears a number of Israeli postage stamps,           
          which appear to have been canceled by the Israel Postal Authority           
          on April 30, 2001.                                                          
               As indicated, respondent moved to dismiss the petition for             
          lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the petition was not                
          timely filed.  In particular, respondent contends that because              
          the envelope in which the petition was mailed to the Court bears            
          a foreign postmark, petitioner may not rely on the so-called                
          timely mailing/timely filing rule set forth in section 7502(a).             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011