The Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund - Page 14




                                       - 14 -                                         
          pension plan participant’s right to his or her normal retirement            
          benefit must become fully vested within specified time limits.              
          Sec. 411(a); see also 29 U.S.C. sec. 1053(a).  When an employee’s           
          accrued retirement benefit is vested, it is nonforfeitable.                 
          Thus, a participant in a defined benefit plan (such as the Plan)            
          is fully vested when he or she has a nonforfeitable right to 100            
          percent of the accrued benefit.  An employee’s accrued benefit at           
          any given time is what a fully vested employee would be entitled            
          to receive under the plan’s formula if the employee ceased                  
          employment at that time.  In order to prevent circumvention of              
          the vesting provisions, the anticutback rule provides that, in              
          order to remain qualified, a plan must not decrease an accrued              
          benefit or reduce a retirement-type subsidy.                                
               The statutory language defining “accrued benefit” for                  
          purposes of the Code supports our conclusion that the NPF COLA is           
          not an “accrued benefit” as to pre-1991 retirees.  Section                  
          411(a)(7) defines “accrued benefit” as “the employee’s accrued              
          benefit determined under the plan and, except as provided in                
          subsection (c)(3), [which is not relevant here] expressed in the            
          form of an annual benefit commencing at normal retirement age”.             
          (Emphasis added.)  Section 411(d)(6), by contrast, protects the             
          “accrued benefit of a participant” from being “decreased by an              
          amendment of the plan”.  (Emphasis added.)  The statutory                   
          construction thus indicates that a retirement benefit may be                






Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011