Rolly J. and Joann M. Sorrentino - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         

               The sole issue for decision is whether petitioners are                 
          liable for the alternative minimum tax (AMT) under section 55.2             
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts and the                
          accompanying exhibits are so found and are incorporated herein by           
          reference.  Petitioners' legal residence at the time the petition           
          was filed was Wheat Ridge, Colorado.                                        
               Petitioners filed a joint Federal income tax return for 1995           
          on which they reported taxable income of $27,267, based on the              
          following gross income items:                                               

               Wages and salaries                 $81,644                             
               Taxable interest income                520                             
               Dividend income                         27                             
               Schedule E real estate loss        (11,422)                            
               Unemployment compensation            4,025                             
               Nonemployee compensation             5,156                             
               Total income                     $79,950                               

          Petitioners' return included a Schedule A, Itemized Deductions,             
          in which they claimed itemized deductions for the following:                





               2    The deficiency includes self-employment tax under sec.            
          1401(a) on self-employment income of $5,156 that petitioners                
          reported as nonemployee compensation on their 1995 return but for           
          which they paid no self-employment tax.  Petitioners conceded               
          this issue at trial.  Another adjustment in the notice of                   
          deficiency disallowed petitioners' child care credit under sec.             
          24 in the amount of $901 because of respondent's determination              
          that petitioners were liable for the alternative minimum tax                
          (AMT).  See sec. 24(d)(2).  This adjustment will be resolved by             
          the Court's holding on the AMT issue.                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011