Robert A. and Nanci M. Spurgin - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          petitioners that their offer could not be considered because “The           
          financial information you provided shows you have sufficient                
          equity and/or income to pay the liability in full now or by an              
          installment agreement.”                                                     
               By a second letter, also dated December 20, 1994, respondent           
          invited petitioners to attend a workshop on January 17, 1995,               
          regarding the preparation of offers in compromise.  Petitioners             
          were informed:                                                              
                    The goal of this workshop is to assist you in                     
               preparing an offer in compromise that can be processed                 
               for further investigation by the Service. * * *                        
               Attending the workshop does not guarantee acceptance of                
               your offer, but it will give you important information                 
               and assistance.                                                        
          Petitioner attended the workshop.                                           
          2.  Petitioners’ Second, Third, and Fourth Offers in                        
          Compromise                                                                  
               On February 14, 1995, respondent received a second offer in            
          compromise from petitioners.  On March 22, 1995, respondent                 
          mailed a letter to petitioners informing them that their second             
          offer could not be processed.                                               
               On April 26, 1995, respondent received a third offer in                
          compromise from petitioners.  On May 31, 1995, respondent mailed            
          a letter to petitioners informing them that their third offer               
          could not be processed.                                                     
               On July 12, 1995, respondent received a fourth offer in                
          compromise from petitioners.  On August 10, 1995, respondent                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011