Darel Guy Taken, Jr. - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
          petitioner’s Federal income taxes for the years and in the                  
          amounts as follows:                                                         
                      Additions to tax                                                
               Year  Deficiency  Sec. 6651(a)(1)  Sec. 6651(a)(2)  Sec. 6654(a)       
               1995    $7,852       $1,860.00           —–-           $403.63         
               1996    15,917        2,472.75        $2,088.10         555.80         
               1997    12,210        2,747.25         1,587.30         657.80         
               The issues for decision are as follows:                                
               (1) Whether petitioner filed a Federal income tax return for           
          any of the years in issue.  We hold that he did not.                        
               (2) Whether petitioner is liable for the deficiencies in               
          income taxes and the additions to tax as determined by respondent           
          in the notices of deficiency.  We hold that he is.                          
               (3) Whether respondent erroneously credited overpayments               
          allegedly claimed by petitioner on returns for prior years                  
          against past due child support, liability for which petitioner              
          disputes.  We hold that we lack jurisdiction to decide this                 
          matter.                                                                     
          Background2                                                                 
               Some of the facts have been stipulated, and they are so                
          found.  Petitioner resided in North Buena Vista, Iowa, at the               
          time that his petition was filed with the Court.                            




               2  The documentary record that was developed at trial was              
          unsatisfactory.  Accordingly, the Court held the record open for            
          60 days so that the parties could produce specific documentary              
          evidence.  Respondent produced what was requested; petitioner did           
          not.                                                                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011