Fred Allnutt - Page 2




                                         - 2 -                                          
                                         Additions to tax and penalties                 
          Year      Deficiency      Sec. 6653(a)    Sec. 6651      Sec. 6662            
          1987      $1,197,033       $63,143      $269,331.98        --                 
          1988         274,146        16,379        61,682.50        --                 
          1989          10,253          –-           2,307.20    $2,050.60              
          1990         112,208          –-          25,247.25    22,441.60              
          1992          82,632          –-          18,592.68    26,526.40              
          1993           1,744          –-              –-          354.80              
          1994          17,581          –-              –-        3,516.20              
          1995          19,992          –-              –-        3,998.40              
          1996          16,702          –-              –-        3,340.40              
          1997          20,177          –-              –-        4,035.40              
               This case is before the Court to decide the following                    
          issues:                                                                       
               1.  Whether respondent timely issued the notice of                       
          deficiency to petitioner for tax years 1987-90 and 1992-95.                   
          Resolution of that issue depends on whether petitioner filed his              
          1987-90 and 1992-95 Federal income tax returns when he hand                   
          delivered those returns to respondent’s offices at 31 Hopkins                 
          Plaza, Baltimore, Maryland, on February 21, 1997.  We hold that               
          his delivery of the returns on that date did not constitute                   
          filing and that the notice of deficiency was timely issued.                   
               2.  Whether petitioner is barred by res judicata from                    
          carrying forward net operating losses from 1981-86 to the years               
          in issue.  We hold that he is.                                                
               3.  Whether to grant petitioner’s motion to dismiss this                 
          case and to impose sanctions on respondent under Rule 104(c).  We             
          will deny petitioner’s motion.                                                








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011