Herbst Asset Management Trust, et al. - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
          preparer for each of Herbst Charitable Trust’s Forms 990-PF for             
          the taxable years 1996 and 1997 that were provided to respondent            
          during respondent’s examination of Herbst Charitable Trust but              
          that respondent has no record of having been filed with respon-             
          dent.  Respondent has identified Mr. Binge as an individual                 
          involved with purported trusts used for tax avoidance purposes.             
               On August 31, 2001, respondent filed separate motions to               
          compel answers to interrogatories and to compel production of               
          documents in each of the cases at docket Nos. 10001-00 and 10002-           
          00.  On September 19, 2001, the Court granted each of those                 
          motions.  Neither Ms. Herbst nor Mr. Herbst answered respondent’s           
          interrogatories or produced the documents requested by respon-              
          dent, as ordered by the Court on September 19, 2001.                        
               On October 3, 2001, Herbst Management Trust, Herbst Charita-           
          ble Trust, Ms. Herbst, and Mr. Herbst filed a joint motion to               
          continue the trial in these cases, which the Court denied on                
          October 4, 2001.                                                            
               On October 15, 2001, these cases were called from the                  
          Court’s trial calendar at the Court’s trial session in Cleveland,           
          Ohio (Cleveland trial session).  At that calendar call, there was           
          no appearance by or on behalf of Herbst Management Trust, Herbst            
          Charitable Trust, Ms. Herbst, and Mr. Herbst.  At that time,                
          respondent orally moved to dismiss each of these cases for                  
          failure to prosecute, and respondent requested, and the Court               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011