Ann M. Lassiter and Estate of Henry A. Lassiter - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
          the estate’s NOLs and the unused NOLs that the estate succeeded             
          to are governed by section 1398(j)(2).  That section provides:              
               (2) Treatment of certain carrybacks.--                                 
                    (A) Carrybacks from estate.--If any carryback year                
               of the estate is a taxable year before the estate’s                    
               first taxable year, the carryback to such carryback                    
               year shall be taken into account for the debtor's                      
               taxable year corresponding to the carryback year.                      
                    (B) Carrybacks from debtor's activities.--The                     
               debtor may not carry back to a taxable year before the                 
               debtor’s taxable year in which the case commences any                  
               carryback from a taxable year ending after the case                    
               commences.                                                             
               The interpretation of the phrase “the debtor shall succeed             
          to and take into account the items referred to in paragraphs (1)            
          * * * of subsection (g)” in section 1398(i) is critical to the              
          resolution of this case.  In determining the meaning of a                   
          statutory provision such as this, the plain meaning of the                  
          provision is ordinarily conclusive.  United States v. Ron Pair              
          Enters., Inc., 489 U.S. 235, 242 (1989).  Such a plain meaning              
          must be ascertained in light of the object and structure of the             
          statute as a whole.  Crandon v. United States, 494 U.S. 152, 158            
          (1990); K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc., 486 U.S. 281, 291 (1988).            
               Bearing in mind the language and design of the statute as a            
          whole, we focus on three portions of the emphasized phrase, see             
          supra note 2, in section 1398(i).  First, Congress chose to                 

               2(...continued)                                                        
               that the transfer is from the estate to the debtor                     
               instead of from the debtor to the estate).  * * *                      
               [Emphasis added.]                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011