- 17 - delay or that the taxpayer's position in such proceeding is frivolous or groundless. The Court has indicated its willingness to impose such penalty in lien and levy cases, Pierson v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. at 580-581, and has in fact imposed a penalty in several such cases, Roberts v. Commissioner, supra; Crow v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-149 (imposing a penalty in the amount of $1,500); Smeton v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002- 140 (imposing a penalty in the amount of $1,000); Newman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-135 (imposing a penalty in the amount of $1,000); Yacksyzn v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-99 (imposing a penalty in the amount of $1,000); Watson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-213 (imposing a penalty in the amount of $1,500); Davis v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-87 (imposing a penalty in the amount of $4,000). We are convinced that petitioner instituted the present proceeding primarily for delay. In this regard, it is clear that petitioner regards this proceeding as nothing but a vehicle to protest the tax laws of this country and to espouse his own misguided views, which we regard as frivolous and groundless. In short, having to deal with this matter wasted the Court's time, as well as respondent's, and taxpayers with genuine controversies may have been delayed. Also relevant is the fact that petitioner is well aware of the provisions of section 6673 as applicable to collection reviewPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011