Roger Stoewer - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          consistent with the procedures set forth in sections 6330(c),               
          (d), and (e).                                                               
               Section 6330(c)(2) prescribes the matters a person may raise           
          at an Appeals Office hearing.  Section 6330(c)(2)(A) provides               
          that a person may raise collection issues such as spousal                   
          defenses, the appropriateness of the Commissioner’s intended                
          collection action, and possible alternative means of collection.            
          Sego v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 609 (2000).  Section                    
          6330(c)(2)(B) provides that the existence and amount of the                 
          underlying tax liability can be contested at an Appeals Office              
          hearing only if the person did not receive a notice of deficiency           
          for the taxes in question or did not otherwise have an earlier              
          opportunity to dispute the tax liability.  Id.; Goza v.                     
          Commissioner, 114 T.C. 176 (2000).                                          
               Pursuant to section 6330(d)(1)(A), within 30 days of the               
          issuance of the notice of determination, the taxpayer may appeal            
          the determination to the Tax Court.  If the Tax Court does not              
          have jurisdiction of the underlying tax liability, the taxpayer             
          may appeal to a U.S. District Court.  Sec. 6330(d)(1)(B).                   
               Initially, we address respondent’s motion.  In respondent’s            
          motion, respondent contends that this Court does not have                   
          jurisdiction over the section 6702(a) frivolous return penalty.             
          Respondent further asks this Court to strike the portion of the             
          petition with respect to the frivolous return penalty.                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011