- 7 - * * * * * * * Is the statute, ordinance or regulation that you rely on to compel me to file tax returns, and pay a tax founded upon duties owed by citizen, resident or creation of the state? (a) If so, what state? (b) Where is the definition of that state found in the statutes, ordinances, or regulations relief [sic] upon? On January 19, 2000, respondent’s counsel sent a letter to petitioner advising him that his position was frivolous and that respondent would ask the Court to impose damages against him under section 6673(a). In a letter dated April 6, 2000, from petitioner to respondent’s counsel, petitioner states the following: I reviewed the sections of the code that you supplied me [sections 1, 61, 6012, attached to counsel’s letter of March 24, 2000]. There is no statement in any of those sections that specifically states that “income” is the thing that is being taxed. Until you establish a legal and factual basis for your claim that “income” is the subject of the tax[,] the amount and sources of my “income” is not relevant to the issue. The IRS issued the notice of deficiency claiming that “income” is the subject of the tax and that because I have “income” I am required to pay a tax on that “income”. I can’t wait to get IRS employees on the stand and ask them “On what factual basis do you claim that “income” is the subject of the tax?” In another letter to respondent’s counsel, dated May 4, 2000, petitioner states: “Provide me any documentation to support any claim that my services to Thunderbug did not have a fair market value of $29,264.00 and that the property thatPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011