Pedro Pelayo-Zabalza - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s Federal             
          income tax for the taxable year 2000 in the amount of $4,679.               
               After a concession by respondent,2 the issues for decision             
          by the Court are as follows:                                                
               (1) Whether petitioner is entitled to head of household                
          filing status.  We hold that he is not.                                     
               (2) Whether petitioner is entitled to an earned income                 
          credit.  We hold that he is not.                                            
               An adjustment to the amount of petitioner's standard                   
          deduction is a purely mechanical matter, the resolution of which            
          is dependent on our disposition of the disputed issue regarding             
          petitioner’s filing status.                                                 
          Background                                                                  
               This case was deemed to be submitted fully stipulated, and             
          the facts stipulated are so found.  Petitioner resided in                   
          Sacramento, California, at the time that his petition was filed             
          with the Court.                                                             
               Throughout the taxable year 2000, petitioner was married to            
          Rita Pelayo and lived with her, together with the couple’s two              
          daughters, in Sacramento, California.                                       
               During 2000, petitioner was employed as a laborer and                  
          received wages in the amount of $11,767.  Rita Pelayo was also              


               2  Respondent concedes that petitioner is entitled to                  
          deductions for dependency exemptions for his two minor daughters,           
          Alejandra Anae and Araceli.                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011