Diane S. Blodgett - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         

               The consent order provided for the creation of a “settlement           
          estate” and a “litigation estate,” to consist of assets                     
          transferred from the business, Mr. Blodgett, and petitioner.  Id.           
          A receiver was appointed to liquidate the assets in the two                 
          estates and disburse the money.  The litigation estate was used             
          to pay litigation expenses for the defense of actual or                     
          reasonably anticipated governmental enforcement actions against             
          Mr. Blodgett or petitioner.  The settlement estate was used to              
          pay claims of defrauded customers of the business.  The                     
          litigation estate was established with $300,000, funded solely              
          through the liquidation of a so-called Coin Fund.  The remaining            
          proceeds from the liquidation of the Coin Fund were transferred             
          to the settlement estate.  The settlement estate also included              
          the Florida property and the Simbari painting, among other                  
          assets.                                                                     
               After the onset of the FTC case but prior to the consent               
          order, creditors of the business filed a chapter 7 involuntary              
          bankruptcy petition against the business pursuant to 11 U.S.C.              
          section 303.  Although the business converted the case to a                 
          chapter 11 proceeding, the bankruptcy court reconverted the case            
          to a chapter 7 proceeding and appointed John Stoebner the trustee           
          on May 28, 1992.  See Stoebner v. Vaughan, 179 Bankr. 600, 601              
          (D. Minn. 1995).  On August 21, 1992, an order was issued by the            
          U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota to the receiver           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011