- 3 - Penalties Year Deficiency1 Sec. 6663 Michael J. Downing 1994 $7,396 $5,444 1995 29,557 22,088 Sandra M. Downing 1994 $2,545 $2,012 1995 20,432 15,404 1 Of these totals for Michael J. Downing (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Michael), for 1994, $2,773 is income tax under ch. 1 and $4,623 is self-employment tax under ch. 2; for 1995, $19,065 is income tax under ch. 1 and $10,492 is self-employment tax under ch. 2. For Sandra M. Downing (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Sandra), all the amounts are income tax under ch. 1. Both sides apparently view the facts in the instant case as leading to Michael’s being solely liable for self-employment tax on any additional net earnings from self-employment, regardless of the disposition of the community property issue. That is, neither side views Sandra’s involvement in the business as resulting in a partnership. See sec. 1402(a)(5)(A). Petitioners did not file joint returns for either of the years in issue (infra note 4), and so Sandra does not have joint and several liability for Michael’s self-employment tax. See sec. 1.6017- 1(b), Income Tax Regs.; see also Johnson v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 1057, 1062 (1980), affd. 661 F.2d 53 (5th Cir. 1981). In each notice of deficiency, respondent determined in the alternative to the fraud penalty that “the addition prescribed by Section 6662(a)” applies (in an unspecified amount) for each year. In the answer, respondent narrows this determination to the negligence penalty, section 6662(b)(1), but the amount remains unspecified. At trial and on brief respondent conceded that if petitioners’ marriage contract was effective to take petitioners out of Louisiana’s usual community property matrimonial regime,Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011