Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
               life.  No deduction for depreciation is allowable with                 
               respect to goodwill.  * * *                                            
          For an intangible asset to be amortizable under section 167(a),             
          the taxpayer must prove with reasonable accuracy that the asset             
          is used in the trade or business or held for the production of              
          income and has a value that wastes over an ascertainable period             
          of time.  Newark Morning Ledger Co. v. United States, 507 U.S.              
          546, 566 (1993); FMR Corp. v. Commissioner, 110 T.C. 402, 430               
          (1998).  The taxpayer must prove that the intangible asset has a            
          limited useful life, the duration of which can be ascertained               
          with reasonable accuracy, and the asset has an ascertainable                
          value separate and distinct from goodwill and going-concern                 
          value.  S. Bancorporation, Inc. v. Commissioner, 847 F.2d 131,              
          136-137 (4th Cir. 1988), affg. T.C. Memo. 1986-601.  In this                
          Opinion, our primary concern is whether, as a matter of law,                
          petitioner’s asserted favorable financing can constitute an                 
          “asset” for purposes of section 167(a).                                     
          III.  Analysis                                                              
               Petitioner argues that its favorable financing represented a           
          valuable economic benefit on January 1, 1985, and is an                     
          intangible asset subject to amortization.  Petitioner claims that           
          the fair market value of this “asset” is measured by the                    
          difference between the market cost of using the borrowed money              
          and its below-market cost.  Respondent argues that petitioner’s             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011