Augustin Bolsover Jombo - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
               At the time petitioner filed the petition in this case, he             
          resided in East Sussex, England.                                            
               On November 25, 1997, respondent mailed to petitioner a                
          notice of deficiency (November 25, 1997 notice) with respect to             
          his taxable years 1993 and 1994, which he received.  On February            
          9, 1998, petitioner filed a petition in the Court with respect to           
          the November 25, 1997 notice.  (We shall refer to the case that             
          petitioner commenced on February 9, 1998, with respect to the               
          November 25, 1997 notice relating to his taxable years 1993 and             
          1994 as the case at docket No. 2446-98.)  The Court set the case            
          at docket No. 2446-98 for trial on December 14, 1998, in Balti-             
          more, Maryland.  The Court continued the trial in that case until           
          April 12, 1999, and set the place of that trial in Washington,              
          D.C.                                                                        
               On April 12, 1999, the Court called the case at docket No.             
          2446-98 for trial in Washington, D.C.  Neither petitioner nor any           
          authorized representative of petitioner appeared at that trial.             
          Respondent orally moved to dismiss the case at docket No. 2446-98           
          for lack of prosecution.                                                    
               On April 12, 1999, the Court entered an Order of Dismissal             
          and Decision (April 12, 1999 Order of Dismissal and Decision)               
          with respect to the case at docket No. 2446-98.  In that Order,             
          the Court (1) granted respondent’s oral motion to dismiss the               
          case at docket No. 2446-98 for lack of prosecution and                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011