David Gerald Lockmiller - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
          Discussion                                                                  
               Section 61(a) provides that “gross income means all income             
          from whatever source derived” except as otherwise provided.  The            
          definition of gross income is broad in scope, Commissioner v.               
          Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 429-430 (1955), and exclusions            
          from gross income are narrowly construed, United States v. Burke,           
          504 U.S. 229, 248 (1992) (Souter, J., concurring in judgment);              
          United States v. Centennial Sav. Bank FSB, 499 U.S. 573, 583-584            
          (1991); Commissioner v. Jacobson, 336 U.S. 28, 49 (1949).                   
               As relevant to the present case, section 104(a)(2) excludes            
          from gross income “the amount of any damages (other than punitive           
          damages) received (whether by suit or agreement and whether as              
          lump sums or as periodic payments) on account of personal                   
          physical injuries or physical sickness”.                                    
               Petitioner candidly admits, as he must, that the $20,000               
          payment was not received on account of personal physical injuries           
          or physical sickness and that, as a consequence, the payment is             
          not excludable from income pursuant to section 104(a)(2).                   
          However, petitioner contends that section 104(a)(2), as amended             
          by the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-              


               4(...continued)                                                        
          1998-395; Kenseth v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 399 (2000), affd. 259           
          F.3d 881 (7th Cir. 2001).  Petitioner has never alleged, much               
          less proven, that the cost incurred in obtaining the $20,000                
          payment, taken in combination with other allowable deductions,              
          exceeds the amount of his standard deduction.                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011