Edward L. and Terri L. Pyrdum - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          Petitioners reported income of $2,424 in 1999 and $2,679 in 2000            
          from the Schedule C activity.2  The car expenses were computed by           
          using the standard mileage expense method.  See Rev. Proc. 98-63,           
          1998-2 C.B. 818 ($.31 per mile); Rev Proc. 99-38, 1999-2 C.B. 525           
          ($.325 per mile).  The depreciation deduction claimed for the               
          1999 taxable year was for automobiles for which deductions using            
          the standard rate were claimed, and petitioners concede that they           
          are not entitled to that deduction.  On the 2000 tax return,                
          petitioners deducted the mortgage interest expense also as an               
          itemized deduction, and they concede that the deduction was                 
          properly disallowed on the Schedule C.                                      
               The activity reported on the Schedules C related to                    
          petitioner Terri L. Pyrdum (hereinafter petitioner).  Petitioners           
          divorced in 2001, and petitioner is now married to Allan Brittain           
          (Mr. Brittain).  During 1999 and 2000, petitioner was employed              
          full time as an inside sales representative by Holt Specialty               
          Equipment (Holt), a machinery manufacturer.  As a sales                     
          representative, she traveled to various machinery trade shows in            
          the region.  Holt reimbursed petitioner for all of her travel               
          expenses incurred on behalf of Holt.                                        
               During the years in issue, petitioner was also associated              
          with Key Credit Corp. (Key Credit), a financing company.  Key               


          2  In the notice of deficiency respondent increased petitioners’            
          income by these amounts.  Respondent concedes that these items of           
          income were included in the returns.                                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011