Estate of Nicholas Charles Stevens, Jr., Deceased, Kim Patricia Bryan, Personal Representative - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          Act upon the death of decedent’s father in 1992.  Decedent, a               
          minor, was 17 years old in 2000.                                            
               Decedent filed a Form 1040EZ, Income Tax Return for Single             
          and Joint Filers with No Dependents, for the 2000 taxable year              
          (2000 return).  Decedent reported wages of $1,048 on his 2000               
          return.  He did not report wages of $4,719 from Mangione                    
          Enterprises of Turf Valley.  Nor did he report the interest                 
          income of $7,435 from custodial accounts.                                   
               Respondent issued decedent a notice of deficiency dated                
          December 23, 2002, determining that decedent was taxable on                 
          unreported income of $12,154 from wages and interest during the             
          2000 taxable year.2  Ms. Bryan contends that a deceased person              
          should not be liable for any tax deficiencies.                              
          Discussion                                                                  
               Decedent having filed his 2000 return after July 22, 1998,             
          section 7491(a) is applicable in the instant case.  However,                
          neither party takes a position as to whether the burden of proof            
          has shifted to respondent under section 7491(a).  We conclude               
          that resolution of the issue whether decedent is taxable on                 
          unreported income of $12,154 does not depend upon who has the               
          burden of proof.                                                            


               2  Respondent also determined that decedent was liable for             
          the addition to tax under sec. 6651(a)(1).  However, as                     
          previously indicated, respondent conceded this issue at the time            
          of trial.                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011