Frederick W. and Candace J. Tiley - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated, and the stipulated             
          facts are incorporated in our findings by this reference.                   
          Petitioners resided in Salem, Oregon, at the time that they filed           
          the petition in this case.                                                  
               In 1978, petitioner Frederick W. Tiley (petitioner) married            
          Kathleen Ann Tiley (Ms. Tiley).  In 1991, petitioner and                    
          Ms. Tiley filed a Stipulated Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage            
          in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of               
          Polk.  On August 27, 1998, petitioner and Ms. Tiley entered into            
          a settlement agreement set forth on the record in a transcript of           
          proceedings in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the             
          County of Polk.  As stated in the record, among other things:               
                    It is the stipulation of the parties that                         
               Dr. Tiley will pay by cashier’s check the sum of                       
               $80,000 on or before September 28th, 1998, to                          
               [Ms.] Tiley.  On condition--by the way, that payment                   
               would all be classified as payment for attorney’s fees,                
               both present and past, and back child support.  None of                
               the $80,000 would be classified as payment of any back                 
               spousal support and both parties have agreed that                      
               Dr. Tiley will not attempt to deduct any portion of                    
               that $80,000 payment as spousal support and that                       
               [Ms.] Tiley would not be required to recognize it as                   
               taxable income.                                                        
          Petitioner was present at the time that the settlement agreement            
          was stated in the record, as shown by the following excerpt from            
          the transcript:                                                             








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011