Gary Lee Colvin - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          has identified neither the amount nor the nature of those                   
          expenditures.                                                               
               Deduction Under Section 216                                            
               Petitioner has failed to explain how section 216, Deduction            
          of Taxes, Interest, and Business Depreciation by Cooperative                
          Housing Corporation Tenant-Stockholder, has any application here.           
          The Court can find no legal or factual relevance of section 216             
          to this case.                                                               
               The Court has considered the other arguments raised by                 
          petitioner and has found them to be without merit.                          
          Conclusion                                                                  
               Respondent's determination that petitioner is not entitled             
          to deduct legal expenses for 1997 and 1998 is sustained.                    
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             for respondent.                          



















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  

Last modified: May 25, 2011