Gary M. Dashiell and Frances J. Dashiell - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
               Petitioners’ 1997 tax return was signed by Gary and Fran               
          under penalties of perjury.                                                 
               After an audit, on June 30, 2000, respondent mailed to                 
          petitioners a notice of deficiency for 1997 in which respondent             
          treated petitioners’ 1997 tax return as a joint 1997 Federal                
          income tax return for petitioners and in which respondent                   
          determined that Gary’s $25,101 in wages constituted taxable                 
          income to petitioners, that Fran received $30,455 in nonemployee-           
          fee income, that Gary and Fran received $15 in interest income              
          and $9,693 in early retirement account distributions, and that              
          petitioners owed a tax deficiency of $12,061 in addition to the             
          $2,114 in Federal income taxes withheld from Gary’s wages.  Also,           
          respondent determined against petitioners a $2,412 accuracy-                
          related penalty under section 6662(a) relating to petitioners’              
          1997 tax return.                                                            
               Petitioners did not file a petition with this Court with               
          regard to respondent’s above deficiency and penalty                         
          determinations, and on November 20, 2000, the above deficiency              
          and penalty, plus statutory interest, were assessed against                 
          petitioners.                                                                
               One year later, on November 20, 2001, a notice of Federal              
          tax lien was filed by respondent against petitioners relating to            
          the assessment against petitioners of the above tax deficiency              
          and penalty.                                                                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011