Virginia Ferguson, f.k.a. Virginia Del Bosque, and Estate of Armand J. Del Bosque, Deceased, Lori Del Bosque, Special Administrator, et al. - Page 33

                                       - 33 -                                         
          disproving the alleged nontaxable source, United States v.                  
          Massei, 355 U.S. 595 (1958); Kramer v. Commissioner, 389 F.2d               
          236, 239 (7th Cir. 1968), affg. T.C. Memo. 1966-234; Parks v.               
          Commissioner, supra.  Petitioners do not allege that they had               
          nontaxable sources of income during the years at issue.  Their              
          known sources of income were the limousine service and sales of             
          leather goods.10  Petitioners have not offered any proof of                 
          offsetting costs or expenses except those which we have allowed.            
          Respondent has shown by clear and convincing evidence that Mr.              
          Del Bosque underreported his income by $23,841 in 1988 (without             
          regard to the overstated long-term capital loss from the sale of            
          the 1 share of Fidelity Growth Fund) and $26,483 in 1989.                   
          Respondent also has shown by clear and convincing evidence that             
          Mr. Jacobsen underreported his income by $27,649 in 1988.  Thus,            
          respondent has carried the burden of establishing underpayments             
          of tax attributable to that omitted income each year by clear and           
          convincing evidence.                                                        
               B.   Fraudulent Intent                                                 
               Respondent must prove by clear and convincing evidence that            
          petitioners had a fraudulent intent.  Parks v. Commissioner,                
          supra at 664.  This burden is met if it is shown that petitioners           


               10Petitioners asserted in their criminal tax proceedings and           
          at the trial in these cases that the omitted income was from                
          gambling.  None of the parties has offered any further                      
          description or explanation of petitioners’ gambling activities.             





Page:  Previous  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011