Garwood Irrigation Company - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          February 18, 1998, Mr. Lehrer and Mr. Rose signed a letter                  
          agreement in which the LCRA agreed to purchase the portion of               
          petitioner’s water right not involved in the Corpus Christi                 
          transaction and petitioner’s irrigation assets for $75 million.             
          The purchase price was proposed by Mr. Lehrer and accepted by the           
          LCRA without negotiation or counteroffer.  As a condition to the            
          sale, the LCRA agreed to withdraw its opposition to the Corpus              
          Christi transaction and to assist petitioner in obtaining                   
          approval for the Corpus Christi transaction from the TNRCC.                 
          Petitioner had the right to cancel the sale if the TNRCC did not            
          approve the Corpus Christi transaction.  Petitioner also agreed             
          not to negotiate with anyone else during the pendency of the sale           
          to the LCRA.                                                                
               On July 20, 1998, petitioner and the LCRA signed a purchase            
          agreement for the sale of the remaining 133,000 acre-foot portion           
          of petitioner’s water right.  On July 22, 1998, petitioner filed            
          an application with the TNRCC for authorization to use the                  
          133,000 acre-foot portion of its water for municipal or                     
          industrial purposes, but only to the extent the water was not               
          needed within petitioner’s service area for irrigation.  The                
          application also requested an expansion of the service area in              
          which petitioner’s water right could be used, to four additional            
          counties within the Colorado River Basin, but again, only to the            
          extent the water was not needed within petitioner’s service area            






Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011