Robert & Polly A. Gatlos - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          taxpayer’s position is frivolous or groundless.  Section                    
          6673(a)(1) applies to proceedings under section 6330.  Pierson v.           
          Commissioner, 115 T.C. 576, 581 (2000).  In proceedings under               
          section 6330, we have imposed the penalty on taxpayers who have             
          raised frivolous and groundless arguments with respect to the               
          legality of the Federal tax laws.  See, e.g., Roberts v.                    
          Commissioner, 118 T.C. 365, 372-373 (2002), affd. 329 F.3d 1224             
          (11th Cir. 2003); Eiselstein v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-22;           
          Yacksyzn v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-99.                               
               In this case, the record for purposes of respondent’s motion           
          clearly establishes that the only arguments made by petitioners             
          during the administrative processing of this case were frivolous            
          and/or groundless.  In their “Claim for Relief From Alleged                 
          Notice of Lien or Levy”, petitioners argued, among other things,            
          that they are not liable for income tax, and they challenged the            
          Secretary’s delegation of authority to IRS employees to collect             
          unpaid taxes.  In their letter to respondent dated December 28,             
          2002, petitioners again raised several frivolous arguments                  
          including an argument that their tax liabilities were invalid               
          because the Sixteenth Amendment does not authorize a direct,                
          nonapportioned income tax on citizens.  At the hearing, Mrs.                
          Gatlos again raised frivolous arguments regarding the                       
          constitutionality of the income tax.  In their petition,                    
          petitioners continued to assert frivolous and/or groundless                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011