Laura A. Gavigan - Page 14

                                       - 13 -                                         
          system.  See Hamzik v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-223;                   
          Gilligan v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-194.                              
               In the present case, respondent requested that the Court               
          impose a penalty pursuant to section 6673(a)(1).  By taking                 
          frivolous and groundless positions regarding the Federal income             
          tax system, some of which have been summarized above, petitioner            
          abused the protections afforded under section 6330.  Petitioner             
          was warned by the Appeals Office that sanctions could result if             
          she continued to make frivolous and groundless arguments.                   
          Petitioner continued to do so, and in petitioning this Court for            
          review, she has wasted the limited resources of this Court.                 
          Accordingly, we shall impose a penalty pursuant to section                  
          6673(a)(1) in the amount of $2,000.                                         
               On the record before us, we shall grant respondent’s motion.           
               Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case               
          Division.                                                                   
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                  An order granting                   
                                             respondent’s motion and                  
                                             decision for respondent                  
                                             will be entered.                         











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  

Last modified: May 25, 2011