William H. Johnston and Nancy S. Johnston - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          estimated tax for 1997.                                                     
               Petitioners do not contend that they had reasonable cause              
          for failure to file their 1994, 1996, and 1997 returns or failure           
          to pay estimated tax for 1997.  They offered no evidence showing            
          that they are not liable for those additions to tax.  We conclude           
          that petitioners are liable for the additions to tax under                  
          section 6651(a) for failure to file for 1994, 1996, and 1997, and           
          under section 6654 for failure to pay estimated tax for 1997.               
          C.   Section 6673 Penalty                                                   
               Respondent moved that the Court impose a penalty on                    
          petitioners under section 6673 on the grounds that petitioners              
          instituted and maintained this case primarily for delay and that            
          their position is frivolous.                                                
               The Court may impose on a taxpayer a penalty of up to                  
          $25,000 if the taxpayer instituted or maintained proceedings                
          primarily for delay, if the taxpayer’s position is frivolous or             
          groundless, or if the taxpayer unreasonably failed to pursue                
          administrative remedies.  Sec. 6673.  A taxpayer's position is              
          frivolous or groundless if it is contrary to established law and            
          unsupported by a reasoned, colorable argument for change in the             
          law.  Coleman v. Commissioner, 791 F.2d 68, 71 (7th Cir. 1986).             
          Petitioners contend that their arguments are not frivolous and              
          that they are not using this case for delay.  We disagree.                  








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011