Said M. Karara - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          2, 2000, the Court of Appeals stayed issuance of the mandate                
          pending petitioner’s petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S.            
          Supreme Court.  On August 8, 2000, petitioner timely requested a            
          hearing for his 1994 tax year by submitting Form 12153, Request             
          for a Collection Due Process Hearing.  During subsequent                    
          conversations with respondent, petitioner consented to the                  
          inclusion of his 1993 tax year, in addition to his 1994 tax year,           
          for purposes of the section 6330 hearing.                                   
               On October 6, 2000, petitioner filed a petition for writ of            
          certiorari with the Supreme Court.  Respondent had the option to            
          file a response to the petition, but declined to do so.                     
          Therefore, in accordance with Supreme Court rules, the Solicitor            
          General timely filed a waiver of the right to respond on behalf             
          of respondent.  Approximately 3 weeks later, on November 6, 2000,           
          the Supreme Court denied petitioner’s petition for writ of                  
          certiorari.  Karara v. Commissioner, 531 U.S. 980 (2000).                   
               On September 24, 2001, respondent applied an overpayment of            
          tax by petitioner in the amount of $300 toward his 1993 tax                 
          liability.                                                                  
               Petitioner and the Appeals officer engaged in telephone                
          conferences on September 5 and October 4 and 5, 2001.  During               
          these conferences, respondent notified petitioner that the                  
          assessments were valid and subject to collection because of                 
          petitioner’s failure to post a bond while his appeals were in               
          progress.  See sec. 7485.  In response, petitioner raised the               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011