CHARLES EDWIN LYKES - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          (1985).  Petitioner’s failure to file is due to reasonable cause            
          if he exercised ordinary business care and prudence and was,                
          nevertheless, unable to file his return within the time                     
          prescribed by law.  Sec. 301.6651-1(c)(1), Proced. & Admin. Regs.           
               The reasons offered by petitioner for his failure to timely            
          file his returns and pay his income taxes are (1) his marital               
          troubles, which concluded in divorce, and (2) his financial                 
          setbacks caused by his ex-wife’s spending habits and his                    
          deployment to Saudi Arabia during Operation Desert Shield/Storm,            
          as a reservist, from November, 28, 1990, until June 29, 1991.               
               In defense of respondent’s refusal to abate the late-filing            
          and late-payment additions to tax, respondent states in his                 
          posttrial brief filed with the Court the following:                         
                    With respect to his marital troubles, petitioner                  
               failed to establish how the illness of his wife, and                   
               his eventual divorce from her, prevented him from                      
               timely filing and paying his taxes over a four year                    
               period, i.e., from April 1997 through May of 2001.                     
               Petitioner did not allege, for example, that during                    
               this four year stretch he was unable to function due to                
               an emotional or physical disability connected to his                   
               troubled marriage. The evidence is to the contrary.                    
               During this time, petitioner was fully able to carry                   
               out the duties of an attorney representing clients in                  
               criminal matters, as well as manage his sole practice                  
               on a day to day basis.  Moreover, petitioner was not                   
               hospitalized or otherwise incapacitated during this                    
               period.                                                                
                    In this regard it is important to note that it is                 
               only after the revenue officer assigned to the case                    
               contacted petitioner, requested his delinquent income                  
               tax returns, and commenced collection activities, that                 
               petitioner came forward and filed his returns during                   
               2001.  This evidence tends to negate that petitioner’s                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011