Milton M. Scarborough, Petitioner and Judy H. Scarborough Barrentine, Intervenor - Page 10

                                        - 9 -                                         
               – Attributable to nonrequesting spouse.  Petitioner has                
          failed to show that the remaining 1999 liability is solely                  
          attributable to intervenor; conversely, he has failed to                    
          establish the extent to which such liability is not attributable            
          to him.  This factor is negative.                                           
               – Significant benefit.  There is no evidence bearing upon              
          whether petitioner did or did not significantly benefit from the            
          unpaid 1999 liability.  This factor is neutral.                             
               – Noncompliance with Federal tax laws.  There is no evidence           
          regarding petitioner’s compliance with Federal income tax laws in           
          the tax years following 1999.  This factor is neutral.                      
               Of the factors listed in section 4.03 of Rev. Proc. 2000-15,           
          one is positive, three are negative, and four are neutral.                  
          Petitioner has brought to our attention no circumstances beyond             
          those encapsulated by the section 4.03 factors.  Our own                    
          judgment, considering those factors, is that it is not                      
          inequitable to hold petitioner liable for the unpaid 1999                   
          liability.  Respondent therefore did not act arbitrarily,                   
          capriciously, or without sound basis in fact by not granting                
          petitioner relief from that liability.                                      
          III.  Conclusion                                                            
               Respondent did not abuse his discretion in denying                     
          petitioner equitable relief from the unpaid 1999 liability.                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011