Richard G. Tuck - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s Federal             
          income tax of $17,632 for the taxable year 1998.                            
               The issues for decision are (1) whether petitioner is                  
          entitled to deduct as a business expense the cost of a double-              
          wide manufactured home which he purchased for a former                      
          girlfriend/employee and for his two children, and (2) whether               
          petitioner is entitled to deduct certain legal expenses as                  
          business expenses.1                                                         
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by this reference.  Petitioner resided in               
          Campton, New Hampshire, on the date the petition was filed in               
          this case.                                                                  
               Petitioner operates a general contracting business as a sole           
          proprietor under the business name of R.G. Tuck Builders.  In               
          late 1992, petitioner and Lisa Brownell (Ms. Brownell) began both           
          a business relationship and a personal relationship.  Ms.                   
          Brownell worked in petitioner’s office handling matters related             
          to petitioner’s general contracting business, as well as certain            
          rental apartments.  Ms. Brownell earned wages of $105 per week,             
          and petitioner reported her wages on Forms W-2, Wage and Tax                
          Statement.  Petitioner and Ms. Brownell resided together during             



          1Petitioner does not dispute any other adjustments in the                   
          notice of deficiency.                                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011