Assaf F. Al Assaf and Rehab Assaf - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          Regs., supra at 5725.  “Participation” generally means any work             
          done in an activity by an individual who owns an interest in the            
          activity.  Sec. 1.469-5(f)(1), Income Tax Regs.                             
               Petitioner wife has shown, through exhibits and testimony,             
          that she provided regular and substantial services to AGI’s                 
          tenants.  Petitioner wife was daily onsite and in charge of AGI’s           
          leasing activities and legal support services during the years at           
          issue.  She estimated, in retrospect, that her total time spent             
          on office leasing activities was approximately 1,340 hours per              
          year.  As the onsite manager of AGI’s legal support services,               
          petitioner wife supervised the office staff, met the business and           
          legal needs of “nine to ten” tenant attorneys and other non-                
          tenant attorneys.  Petitioner wife also performed payroll,                  
          accounts payable, and accounts receivable services, and                     
          maintained the law library.                                                 
               Respondent argues that, while petitioner wife provided a               
          good faith estimate of her time spent in AGI’s activities, it was           
          not based on any objective measure, and the lack of                         
          contemporaneous logs or calendars cast doubt on her pretrial                
          estimate of time spent in the activities.10  As a result,                   


               10It is not clear whether respondent disputes that                     
          petitioner wife materially participated in the activity.  For               
          example, respondent discusses Shaw v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.              
          2002-35, which held that a taxpayer had not materially                      
          participated in a passive activity.  Respondent also claimed that           
          petitioner wife did not adequately document the extent of time              
          she spent on the activity.  Respondent’s arguments, however,                
          focused primarily on the number of hours petitioner wife worked             
          in relation to the real estate professional exception, which                
          requires, among other things, that petitioner wife spend in                 
          excess of 750 hours on the activity.  Because our holding does              
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011