- 4 - derived. Relevant for our purposes, section 86(a) provides that if the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income1 plus one-half of the Social Security benefits received by the taxpayer exceeds the adjusted base amount, then gross income includes the lesser of: (1) The sum of (a) 85 percent of such excess, plus (b) the lesser of (i) one-half of the Social Security benefits received during the year or (ii) one-half of the difference between the adjusted base amount and the base amount of the taxpayer; or (2) 85 percent of the Social Security benefits received during the taxable year.2 See sec. 86(a)(2). With respect to married taxpayers who file a joint return for 2001, the base amount and the adjusted base amount are $32,000 and $44,000, respectively. Sec. 86(c)(1)(B) and (2)(B). In the absence of a section 86(e) election,3 Social Security benefits are included in the 1 In this case, petitioners’ modified adjusted gross income equals their adjusted gross income. See sec. 86(b)(2). 2 Prior to 1984, certain disability benefits were excludable from an employee’s gross income under sec. 105. However, this section was repealed, and “since 1984 Social Security disability benefits have been treated in the same manner as other Social Security benefits.” Maki v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-209. 3 In the case of a lump-sum payment of Social Security benefits, sec. 86(e) provides for an election that limits the portion of the lump-sum payment otherwise includable in the recipient’s income. Petitioners made no such election in this case.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011